Yes, I will be still +1 because there's no other way of fully testing compatibility of Hadoop with downstream projects but using Bigtop.
Cos On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 03:21PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Then, would you still +1 without the addition?═ If yes, you should -1 on this > VOTE. > Tsz-Wo > > ________________________________ > From: Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 8:40 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5 > > > +1 with one addition I'd like to make to the plan > > ═ - making downstream testing a passing criteria for the release. I don't mean > ═ ═ that Hadoop community needs to be responsible for testing of _all_ > ═ ═ downstream components. What I'd like to see is a practice we used in the > ═ ═ 2.0.4-alpha with Bigtop 0.6 where passage of the tests in the latter was > ═ ═ a, perhaps unofficial, release criteria for the former. > > I also agree with 2.0.5 versioning, because essentially, future stability of > the API - of freezing - is the solid base we all are looking for. > > Cos > > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:53PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > Please vote on the following plan for Hadoop release 2.0.5 > > - bug fixes encountered in current release 2.0.4-alpha > > - make all API changes to allow freezing them post 2.0.5 > > - no new features > > > > As discussed on @dev thread > > http://s.apache.org/fs > > this will allow to stabilize 2.0 branch in a short and predictable period > > of time. > > This enables a powerful option to have the release tested at Yahoo scale. > > The plan is to follow up with 2.1.0 - the stable release. > > New features can and should be added on top of the stable release once it > > is out. > > > > Hadoop by-laws: > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html > > > > "Release Plan > > Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also nominates a > > Release Manager. > > Lazy majority of active committers" > > > > assume nomination of a Release Manager with the plan. > > It would be really good if Arun continues if this plan is adopted. > > We can return to the RM topic if not. > > > > The vote will run for 7 days until next Wed, May 8th. > > > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
