Chris, Not everybody who is voting now provided context in the discussion thread. You did. And I am sorry I did not understand it. Formally, bylaws void only vetos with no explanations. So I agree it is not required in this vote as there are no vetos. Wouldn't it be good to know though.
--Konst On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the voting thread, not the discussion one. > > The discussion was going on the dev thread. > [...] > > Oh. And it would be good to have an explanation for -1 votes. > > Only one negative vote came with a reason so far. > > As you point out, we have discussion threads because establishing > intent in voting threads is ambiguous. Everyone voting in this thread > provided context in the other, though no explanation is required. -C >
