Leo Simons wrote:
Absolutely! A good test of maturity. If the mentor is doing absolutely nothing and things are going well, then there is no need for a mentor and quite possibly no need for the project to be in incubation anymore.
Exactly!
So you are saying there should be a single liason for a project, and at the same time an important goal for the project would be to stop talking to/through this liason?
When did liason come into this?
Steve introduced it a few messages back.
I am confused as to what on earth oversite and assistance has to do with liason?
Steve indicated that Noel was filling all three those roles.
I am also confused as to why having an identified person would restrict others from being involved?
it doesn't. But the point is that the project needs to figure out what person should be identified to handle a particular thing themselves. For example, if a project needs a committer added, someone from a project itself should contact root, not some mentor/liason/other identified person.
The point is to make projects responsible for themselves from the start, to the maximum extent possible. That includes the identifying of persons/groups/etc.
- LSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
