On Apr 26, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Apr 26, 2005, at 1:28 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 12:42 PM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My thought is to establish the notion of hiberation status, on the philosophy that open source doesn't die, it just hiberates awaiting community. I dislike the comments people have made about morgues, graveyards, etc. But this is something I'll raise in the Incubator.
If a project can't exit the incubator, it should be terminated.
Or ejected.
I doubt that hibernation would solve the problem... If a community doesn't
grow around an "active" project, I would be surprised if one sprung
up around a sleeping one :)
I'm sure it does happen, but I tend to not like open ended issues... How long would we let the hibernation continue?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
