William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> At 05:42 AM 7/7/2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

>>Right now I see this process as a mixed bag that is made much
>>harder by the disjoint between the incubator PMC and the incubated
>>projects' private lists.  I wonder what would happen if we made
>>a single "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" list for all the podlings instead
>>of the separate ppmc lists?
> 
> 
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (until we rename these to private across the ASF).
> 
> I'll give a huge +1 to your idea though.  I agree that only people
> discussions and confidential negotiations belong on private@,
> and by watching other ppmc's grapple with these issues, all of our
> incubating projects will learn from one another.

A combined list has the possibility of a potential committer to
incubator project X seeing discussion about themselves because they are
a committer on incubator project Y.

Dan.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to