On Aug 1, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

--On August 1, 2005 12:06:27 AM -0400 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Comments?  (Like I need to ask for them... )


I think Part II should be removed or rather be the opposite: which components are you forbidden to participate in due to the answers in the questionnaire. I don't like seeing the community get pigeon- holed like that: commit access should be 'blanket' unless there's a legal reason not to do so.

That is what Part II is - you can do anything except for the specific pieces for which you declare.

I see why you were confused by it, so we'll clean up that language.


Part IV should contain mention of the software grant to the ASF. We should have these on file for all large donations not developed under the 'confines' of the ASF.

Ah, yes. I thought I stated that clearly that standard ASF policy is the base for this all - SG or CCLA+SG is required. Will fix to be clear.


Part VIII should probably mention "employed by a corporation". (Self-employed people wouldn't necessarily need to sign a CCLA.)

Sure.  Good point.


Furthermore, my understanding of copyright law is that you can't be tainted by 'reading' source code years ago and then writing a version independently.

I think it depends on the source. If there's a trade secret that you learned in the process, you probably still have a problem, right?

(In fact, the examples I've heard of are 'minutes apart' is legally acceptable.) Of course, patent infringement occurs whether you've read the code or not. FWIW, our compiler languages class here at UC Irvine teaches Java internals - therefore, they'd all be 'tainted' under this definition - which isn't actually the case.

Ok - this is a good example to help is iteratively clarify. How are they tainted?


The relevant questions should be whether you are currently covered by an NDA or other confidential agreements with Sun (err, BigCo). -- justin

It's more than just Sun - that's the problem. Sun licenses their code to everyone, and therefore you could be under NDA with, oh, IBM, because you worked on IBMs production J2SE platform which uses licensed Sun code...

geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to