On 8/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pardon me for being so ignorant, but all i know of apache is what i read
online and what i have observed from this list.
it seems to me that there are a few recurring concerns about these items,
even in the short period that i have been subscribed.
the incubation, the releases, and the user lists - and the general feeling
toward projects that are in the incubator.
here are a few snippets that cast a lot of doubt on where things actually
stand:
> Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Then, in its README Axis2 should make very clear which function relies
> on Woden and that this function isn't production ready because it is
> reliant on an incubator podling.
statements like these are always answered by stating that incubation does
not reflect on code quality or whether or not a project is production ready
- but the general negative sentiment is clearly there even if not true in
the eyes of apache folks. and it comes up often.
I wrote this meaning that Woden isn't production ready but can now see
you could interpret my words as meaning all incubator podlings aren't
production ready - which certainly isn't the case. I hope this isn't
a' Freudian slip' on my part and if it is then is solely because I
have limited exposure to podlings other than Woden. So I apologise.
IMHO, the confusion arises because the podlings aren't *endorsed* as
Apache projects. Making a leap from that to 'is not production ready'
is wrong.
Cheers,
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
