On 8/25/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
>> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
>> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it. If
>> you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it
>> without further comment and that's perfectly fine too. -- justin
>
> Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the
> next podling I propose :-)
Although... an explanation can go a long way to have other pmc members
consider the issues, good and bad, that they might have overlooked.
+1
anyone feel like stepping up to add the content of this thread to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html...?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
