Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Where in:
> > - The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC
> > - The PPMC (Mentors) elects additional PPMC members
> > - The PPMC elects Committers
> > you see that requirement? I don't see anything excluding the PPMC from
> > voting in all of the existing and active wicket committers. Seems like
a
> > reasonable criteria.
> The problem is that this is not explicitly clear from the policy. All
> the policy states, and the feeling people get from reading this list
> is that 'Worthiness' needs to be proven before anyone can be part of
> the project.
Ah, the line between law and jurisprudence. To be specific:
jurisprudence, n: the branch of philosophy concerned with the law and
the principles that lead courts to make the decisions they do
The process says:
- The PPMC elects Committers
which is a simple statement of process, but you're tacitly assuming
criteria.
> This is what kept me and a lot of our committers away from
> entering the incubator. The policy doesn't instigate a
> feeling of trust with regards to the current members of
> pre-podling projects.
Would it help if the process document illustrated the process and had FAQs?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
