On 11/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is not a kind of attitude i would expect from a professional > organization. a big part of joining apache is the desire for a stable and > maintained infrastructure. we (wicket) came here from sf.net. things used to > go down there all the time, but they would get fixed - it wasnt a matter of > a "want" but part of the service they provide. sorry to rant, but its very > disappointing to see things like these here. This is no different than any other volunteer driven project. If someone showed up at Wicket and demanded that their bug in an obscure part of the system get immediate attention despite the fact that everyone was busy working on other things I doubt you'd all jump up, drop what you're doing and go fix their problem, so why are you surprised when that happens in other places?
firstly no one is demanding anything, just expressing an opinion. it really depends on how you define "obscure". imho a wiki is not an obscure part of the infrastructure because most projects use it/need it. if the service is not maintained properly or there is a lack of resources to maintain it at least for a somewhat long term then i dont think it should be offered at all. we put a lot of energy into building up our wiki, and so do our users. it would be a shame to see all that work disappear because there was a "lack of volunteers". -igor -garrett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
