oops, pressed send too fast!. and a check for the downloaded files before issuing a fresh <get>. So for offline builds you have to be on-line once..
thanks, dims On 11/24/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, typically we end up using ant's <get> tag to get such files... -- dims On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, we'd like to have it as part of our build as it seems necessary to > test JAXB 2 + soap with attachments*. We've included it as a URL instead of > a local file now, but that breaks offline builds - which we've worked hard > to avoid so far. > > Regards, > > - Dan > > * I'm going to confirm that though. It'll be interesting to see what the TCK > includes.... :-) > > On 11/24/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert, > > > > Users can download that xsd and use it themselves. We don't have to > > ship it in the box:) > > > > -- dims > > > > On 11/24/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN. > > > > > > thanks :-) > > > > > > > I'm curious to > > > > know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd file as I > don't > > > > think its possible to use the JAXB 2.0 soap with attachments support > without > > > > referencing this file. I know the JAXWS-RI itself redistributes it, > which > > > > may have thrown us off. > > > > > > yeh - that's understandable > > > > > > far too often, web standards are a real PITA legally speaking > > > > > > > Are there any WS-I experts around that can shed light on this? > > > > > > or (alternatively) ws standards process experts > > > > > > dims? sanjiva? > > > > > > > It is hard to > > > > conform to the basic profile if you can't use their schemas in > > > > projects/products - which kind of defeats the point. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > this point needs to make frequently and strongly to standards > > > organisations. it may be worth trying to open a dialog (again?) > > > > > > may need to do a clean room implementation (if that's allowed by the > > > specification) > > > > > > > I will start a thread sometime soon on legal-discuss on how to best > deal > > > > with this. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > Envoi Solutions > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog -- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
