On 12/7/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of the > follow options and get your +1? > 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar > 2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to our > wishes > 3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses any of these sound fine
Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-). If we decide we need to distribute them we can create a separate VOTE for the javadoc jars. Otherwise we'll just fix them our next release when hopefully the maven plugin will be working... With that caveat can we get an official +1? ;-) - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
