On Dec 23, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/23/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really fail to see how all that is such a big deal.
We're talking an additional 2 sentences....
I think it's a concern because the precedent puts the podling on the
defensive and in the mind set of "oh, if there's a competing project,
we won't accept you." The fact that there's a project already here
that 'competes' is irrelevant to us and I don't want to confuse the
podlings into thinking that's a criteria when it's certainly not. --
Ah, I see your point. My PoV is that it's better to nip
any such things in the bud first. This places those
who would complain on the defensive ;)
But competition is a fact of the real world, and
for some podlings its a prime factor *for* its
inclusion. But it should never be a factor
for its rejection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
