According to the process defined in http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Exiting+the+Incubator the Incubator needs to vote first and nod to the accepting PMC that the project is ready to leave the incubator. Seems to be logical since it is the Incubators decision to say if a project successfully incubated.
Mvgr, Martin William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > (With the addition of Nick Kew's late +1) attached is the summary > of the vote thread on httpd to accept mod_ftp, incubation complete > to their satisfaction, and the vote thread on mod_ftp-dev to start > the graduation process. In short, > > 4 binding +1 votes (and 1 nonbinding +1) by mod_ftp to exit the > incubator as an httpd sub-project. > > 6 binding +1 votes by httpd to accept mod_ftp as its subproject. > > Votes to graduate mod_ftp from the incubator? > > > > +1 here with my incubator pmc hat on. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation) > From: > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:00:35 -0500 > To: > dev@httpd.apache.org > > To: > dev@httpd.apache.org > CC: > mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org > > X-Account-Key: > account5 > Return-Path: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: > from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.2]) by > ardent.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(3.4) MX) with SMTP id 8BD089E38 for > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:01:02 -0500 (EST) > Received: > (qmail 89932 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 14:01:05 -0000 > Mailing-List: > contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: > bulk > Reply-To: > dev@httpd.apache.org > list-help: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > list-unsubscribe: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Post: > <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org> > List-Id: > <dev.httpd.apache.org> > Delivered-To: > mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org > Received: > (qmail 89914 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2007 14:01:05 -0000 > Received: > from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by > apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:01:05 -0800 > X-ASF-Spam-Status: > No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= > X-Spam-Check-By: > apache.org > Received-SPF: > pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) > Received: > from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by > apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:00:56 -0800 > Received: > from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) > with ESMTP id 34F9E49A10E; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:00:36 -0500 (EST) > In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: > 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) > Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: > 7bit > X-Mailer: > Apple Mail (2.752.2) > X-Virus-Checked: > Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > > Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting: > > +1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd): > Justin Erenkrantz > Jim Jagielski > Ruediger Pluem > Will Rowe > Sander Temme > > No -1 votes, so I would call the vote as approving > graduation. > > The consensus is that: > > 1. mod_ftp be a httpd sub-project (ala mod_box) > 2. mod_ftp will use the httpd lists (dev, user, etc...) > and not have separate lists > > I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections > and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation > process. > . > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [VOTE] Prepared to graduate? > From: > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:23:31 -0500 > To: > mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org > > To: > mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org > > X-Account-Key: > account4 > Return-Path: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: > from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.2]) by > adamant.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(3.4) MX) with SMTP id 090ECAA03 for > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:24:00 -0500 (EST) > Received: > (qmail 42107 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 21:24:03 -0000 > Mailing-List: > contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: > bulk > List-Help: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Post: > <mailto:mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org> > List-Id: > <mod_ftp-dev.incubator.apache.org> > Reply-To: > mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org > Delivered-To: > mailing list mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org > Received: > (qmail 42096 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2007 21:24:03 -0000 > Received: > from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by > apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:24:03 -0800 > X-ASF-Spam-Status: > No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= > X-Spam-Check-By: > apache.org > Received-SPF: > pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) > Received: > from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by > apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:23:52 -0800 > Received: > from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) > with ESMTP id 225CB3F4D2C for <mod_ftp-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Thu, > 11 Jan 2007 16:23:32 -0500 (EST) > MIME-Version: > 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) > In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: > 7bit > X-Mailer: > Apple Mail (2.752.2) > X-Virus-Checked: > Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > X-MFData: > [v2.3 t0,199218] > > > So it looks like we have 4 binding votes and 1 > non-binding. > > Cool! > > I will craft a letter to the httpd PMC. > > woohoo! > > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Ryan Morgan wrote: > >> >> +1 here as well. >> >> On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>>> Reports are positive that (with IPv4) the module builds and runs >>>> against >>>> Apache 2.0 and 2.2 from trunk. We are at a juncture; create an >>>> incubation >>>> 'release'? Or graduate and integrate, and let httpd as a whole decide >>>> "what next?" >>>> >>>> +/-1 >>>> [+1] Propose Graduation into [EMAIL PROTECTED], followe by [EMAIL >>>> PROTECTED] >>>> (The final signoff is "has the sponsoring project voted to >>>> accept?") >>> >>> >>> +1's from Jim, Sander, Bill, Niklas. Anyone else before Jim reports >>> the vote >>> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking to be accepted 'back home' in httpd (who >>> sponsored our >>> incubation in the first place)? >>> >>> Open question - ftp-dev sublists and separate repository under >>> httpd/mod_ftp, >>> or into the httpd/trunk? I suppose that's the choice of httpd >>> itself, not us. >> > > . > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
