On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip/> > > There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g. > > > > dojo.js.uncompressed.js > > custom_rhino.jar > > flash6_gateway.fla > > > > > Hmm, custom_rhino.jar is an interesting one. Prior to version 1.6R5, I > believe Rhino was MPL licensed, and as of 1.6R5 it is dual licensed under > MPL and GPL. It is coming to XAP through Dojo. Do we know which version of > Rhino this is? > > If it's 1.6R5 or later, how does a dual MPL / GPL license work in an ASF > project? Does the ASF have to pick one of the licenses, and are we allowed > to do that? Can we distribute something that's potentially GPL licensed? i dislike dual licenses (there is some legal uncertainty see http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html) but AIUI most of the rest of the legal group are ok with them. for ASF purposes, it would be treated as MPL1.1. - robert
