On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 18, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to >> be the zipped code. > > FTR, Apache only needs this if there is no other way to map the > contribution to the contributor. The easiest way to map them is > to have the contributor (or their employee) commit the code > directly to subversion or attached to jira/bugzilla, in which > case the checksum is unnecessary.
yes: apache just needs a clear method of identifying the contribution covered by the grant. checksums are one method by which can be achieved. if the contribution is submitted through an issue tracker or by subversion then IMHO the URL should suffice. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
