Definitely a big step in the right direction, however...... The ruby, c++, and python packages don't have the disclaimer in them.
The Java licenses file mentions the EPL, but I didn't see any eclipse licensed jars and stuff. I could have missed it though. Not a big deal though. Dan On Tuesday 02 September 2008 5:25:08 pm Aidan Skinner wrote: > There were some problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files in RC3 (is > there a good guide to this anywhere? having all the individual > licenses in LICENSE seems odd to me...) so I've rolled RC4[1] and > would like to restart the vote to release Apache Qpid M3. > > I started the vote on qpid-dev at 2008-08-22: > http://markmail.org/message/2a6pmx3sdgvh5bu5 > And closed it on 2008-08-27 http://markmail.org/message/xb3qppr5krtdp43w > > There were: > 8 +1s (1 of which was binding) > 0 0's > 0 -1's > > Which were cast by: > Alan Conway > Arnaud Simon > Martin Ritchie > Gordon Sim > Carl Trieloff > Yoav Shapira (binding) > Rajith Attapattu > Lahiru Gunathilake > > Artifacts can be found at http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid/M3-RC4/ > Release notes are located here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12312117&sty >leName=Html&projectId=12310520&Create=Create > > Please vote to: > [+1] Release Apache Qpid M3 > [0] que? > [-1] No, there's still an issue with it which needs to be corrected > > - Aidan > > [1] I ran release.sh and uploaded the output, ritchiem did the actual > leg work for this one -- Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
