Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> >> wrote: >>> To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and >>> necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole. >> Nope... The whole IPMC has been tasked with oversight. The mentors are >> proxies for the whole IPMC. > > You can't have it both ways. By approving the proposal, the IPMC > delegates its oversight authority to the mentors. The IPMC then > confirms that the proper process was followed when it votes for > graduation. The mentors can ask for pre-approval for certain > 'waivers' like Greg is asking for - but it's unfair for a non-mentor > to try to tell a podling what it can or can not do. -- justin
Whoa. Have you really been absent from Incubator for this long? Granted, each mentor is only -one- voice, each IPMC member is only -one- voice, with equal standing in the Incubator PMC and as ambassadors to the PPMC efforts. But a non-mentor has no less responsibility or authority to help work out a problem than a mentor does. Get down off the high horse before you hurt yourself ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
