Just to clarify: I'm assuming you're saying "+1 to the proposal", rather than to my comment. Correct?
And to clarify for myself: I have no opinion on the proposal itself. I timed out after "Java" and the next few buzzwords. Thankfully, this proposal didn't say "framework" or I may have timed out after the first :-P ... my comments were focused on the community aspects around mailing list management, and successfully growing a lively and sustainable critical mass. Cheers, -g On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 02:06, Pid <p...@pidster.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Small point: if a Mentor must be a Member, I can't be one, because I'm not. > > > p > > On 08/09/2010 16:00, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >> +1 (Notbinding) >> >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks <matt...@matthewsacks.com>wrote: >>>> ... >>> >>>> *Mailing Lists* >>>> >>>> kitty-dev >>>> kitty-commits >>>> kitty-user >>>> >>> >>> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the >>> community across dev/user does not make sense. You want to keep the users >>> and developers on the same mailing list until one starts to overwhelm the >>> other. By partitioning the lists too early, you risk never reaching >>> "critical mass" on *either* mailing list. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -g >>> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
