Not only did we ask, we've asked more than once. We're going that extra mile to call a vote to resolve this issue specifically because there seems to be a wide range of opinion as to whether the name is acceptable to the incubator, and by implication, the board. It's quite clear that there's also a wide range of opinion as to whether or not it's a good name or a bad name, but hopefully people who care deeply about the quality of our name choice would find time to subscribe to connectors-dev and vote on issues of this kind. It seems to me that that is the proper forum for discussions about naming aesthetics.
Karl On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:54 PM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a > > slamdunk easy thing. If the podling wants to change their name, then > > fine. Sounds easy enough. I would see no reason for anybody outside > > the podling to -1 that choice, and might even say that I'd be upset if > > they did... > > They asked. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
