On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Jérôme Verstrynge <jvers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are working on getting the relicensing to 2.0. What do you mean by 'it > allows sublicensing'? Would we, as a community, have the right to relicense > this code? IANAL, bring it to legal-discuss@ But a friendly observation; only the copyright owner has the right to relicense. But ASL 1.1 allows "sub-licensing" within the terms and conditions of the license. What that means is that you can license as Apache License v2.0, but must follow all the conditions of 1.1, which includes among other things, keeping the source headers which can be unnecessary messy. Better to get the copyright owner to relicense to 2.0 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
