I am also pro Ant's suggestion, and make the trial a permanent change. My initial thought was that "well, since the paperwork is already done for existing committers, why would anyone object", but let's go all the way...
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Shift this to general@ ? > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 05:08, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 04:30, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: >>>> Could we change this, so that if the person is already a committer in >>>> another PMC, then the podling's decision doesn't need Incubator PMC >>>> votes?? >>> >>> Let's not complicate our processes by adding such special cases. >>> >>> I'd rather go with Ant's proposal that simplifies the process for >>> everyone, not just for people who're already "in". >> >> Even better than my smaller extension! +1 from me >> >> There *are* mentors watching how the PPMC selects and votes upon new >> committers. There doesn't seem to be much downside here. -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
