Hi Benson,
I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software
grant plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to
work on Apache projects, whether on their own time or company time.
So, if a CCLA is filed naming the software, a separate SGA is *not*
necessary.
Craig
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I can't find anything in [1] that states any conditions in which a
CCLA won't do and an SGA is required instead.
The Jena podling has asked me. Their situation is that an HP copyright
is thought to cover all the 'corporate' code, and they wonder if there
is any reason for them to chase an SGA on top of the CCLA that they
will need anyhow.
1: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
Chair, OpenJPA PMC
[email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
