Hi... On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On most months, I have to chase down missing reports. >> >> ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF >> (also managed to do a release, though), RAT and WAVE all failed to report >> this month. >> >> RAT was discussing graduation, but still needs to report. Two others were >> active enough to put out releases, but failed to report. Wave has been >> active enough to discuss their next steps, but failed to report.
Indeed, I would say that this be the responsibility of Mentors even if the schedule has some faults, they should check whether the schedule is correct or not and if correct to push towards having the report on time. >> >> What should be done with these projects? Which one(s) should be retired? > > Wave is active. They have just imported their code to svn and said > they wanted to report this fact. I am not sure why they didn't and > will ping them. > > I have another question. > > My feeling is that some of the projects are missing active mentors. I > mean... shouldn't they be there and tell them how important reporting > is? Shouldn't they somehow trigger their podlings? Finally they need > to sign the reports. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
