On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine. >>> >>> It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here >>> (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for >>> other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release >>> artifact. You could then create "convenience artifacts" off that. >> >> Having multiple archive types is very common in other ASF projects. >> > > Ok, but that means that we need to verify/vote on both, correct? (we
yes. > can do them together, I'm just saying that it requires more reviewer > work than just verifying the single artifact). > >>> I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are exactly the >>> same, just differing archiving tools. >> >> Or possibly also differing in EOL setting, e.g. >> Windows more commonly has zip support, so source may have EOL=CRLF >> Un*x systems more commonly support tar/gz, so source may have EOL=LF. > > In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference > btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification > simpler). Yes. The source archive(s) should also be checked against the SVN tag. > Patrick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
