On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be some people assuming that the IPMC wants to > terminate the Kato podling. Looking back I wonder if my original > status review was the source of this: > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2008-11-06 Kato >> >> S: Zero activity. >> R: Terminate. > > This was based on looking at commit and kato-dev@ list activity, both > zero or very low for an extended amount of time. There was no recent > status report. > > Now, as has been pointed out, the project is facing some unique > constraints that I wasn't aware of. Thus I followed up: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The status of Kato (in relation to Oracle's actions) is being >> evaluated. Ant is helping the community. > > Based on the thread at [1]. The resulting status report [2] suggests > that before the next report the community should "decide in what form > the podling should continue, if at all". > > As far as I'm concerned, that's a reasonable step forward. I'm looking > forward to seeing a followup discussion about this on kato-dev@. The > results should be summarized as an action plan in the next status > report. >
Thanks Jukka, I'll make sure that happens. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
