I see that Ralph already removed the worst of my excesses, and I fixed a few others. Are we good?
I'm really not in this to win a fight ( -- or an election --) but rather to help the community reach a consensus by stating a (hopefully) clear alternative. On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, > > I read your proposal, and I read as lot of other email, and it appears > that the results in my head were a bit of a salad. After re-reading > your proposal, I will make some mods in a moment and remove that > remark in particular. > > --benson > > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I am +1 to what your proposal does. I am not so fond of the wording of it. >> I've tried to make changes to eliminate pointing fingers but just couldn't >> with the last section. I would suggest you take another stab at editing it >> to: a) make this proposal a general document, not just from you, and b) try >> to remove as many names as possible. It also might be helpful if the >> proposal was worded as if Chris' didn't exist. Just document what the >> process would be and how it solves the problems we have now. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> I've added http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AlternativeIncubatorAnalysis >>> to the wiki, offering a more or less concrete alternative that is more >>> evolutionary and less revolutionary. Get out your darts, and feel free >>> to edit. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
