Sorry for taking time .. here is my +1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 1, 2012, at 11:18 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 1 May 2012 14:54, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is the first incubator release for Apache Airavata, with the > artifacts being versioned as 0.2-incubating. > >> > >> We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have > received 2 binding Mentors/IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on > airavata-dev: > >> > >> Community VOTE & RESULT Thread : > http://markmail.org/thread/5vcfvyezsfzzgfd2 > >> > >> Mentors/IPMC member votes from the Airavata-Dev list: > >> Ate Douma: +1 > >> Chris Mattmann: +1 > >> > >> Detailed change log/release notes: > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.2-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES > >> > >> All Release Artifacts: > >> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/ > >> > >> PGP release keys (signed using 617DDBAD): > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/KEYS > >> > >> Specific URL's: > >> > >> SVN source tag (1330645): > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.2-incubating/ > >> > >> Source release: > >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/airavata-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip > >> > >> Binary Artifacts: > >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/apache-airavata-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz > >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/apache-airavata-0.2-incubating-bin.zip > > > > The NOTICE file in the binary archive contains the following: > > > > ========================================================================= > > == NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apache License, == > > == Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Airavata distribution. == > > ========================================================================= > > > > This definitely should not be present. > > > > There are lots of other entries in the NOTICE file; it's not clear to > > me whether they are all needed or not. > > AIUI, the NOTICE file should only contain *required* notices (whereas > > the LICENSE file should contain ALL applicable licenses) > > Hi Sebb, > > For the past few months we were too focussed on making sure we include all > the required notices and in the process we ended up with more than whats > needed. We tried to minimize these extra notices as much as possible, but > not quite there yet. Do you see this as a blocker for this release? > > To get the License, Notice files right, we branched a stable version and > trunk moved too far ahead. If this extra notices are not too critical > blockers, we would like to wrap this release and merge back to trunk and > address the unnecessary notice information. Will that be acceptable? > > Thanks, > Suresh > > >> Maven staging repo: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheairavata-108/ > >> > >> Please verify the artifacts and vote. The vote will be open for 72 > hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- ============================ Srinath Perera, Ph.D. Senior Software Architect, WSO2 Inc. Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa Member, Apache Software Foundation Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/ Phone: 0772360902
