Hi Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Jul 16, 2012 1:41 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > > This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the low > > diversity trap while Incubator focuses on more process driven IP, release, > > graduation. > > Sounds good. > > > Of course this means we should figure our exactly what "low diversity" is. > > As discussed recently low diversity is not a problem if the project can > > demonstrate it is open to newcomers. > > Right. I'm even thinking that we should drop the "low diversity" label > and simply replace it with a more generic "not yet ready to graduate" > one until we have a better shared understanding of the things podlings > falling into that category still need to do.
"Not ready for graduation" is also too generic, for thw low diversity case we can have of "lacking to attract new committers" , in that case maybe the podling community can explain why to the IPMC also /w the help of Mentors and hence we are able to evaluate whether the reasons are really valid not to graduate or not For examle Isis is a very active and healthy community but it took a while till new blood comes into the community, which is changing recently but I believe it happens to other podlings as well But in general as u mentioned more investigations about categories of such cases is idd required > > > Given I committed to find a way for ComDev to support the Incubation > > process do you think this is a starting point? > > Yes. Going through all the podlings in that category and trying to > spot common patterns and areas of potential trouble or improvement > would be my first step here. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
