Hi AS you can read I used the word *should* and in the rules say "...It is wise to copy the incubator general list when the vote is proposed." So Christian did the *wise* thing :D
If you don't like that, and I see your point BTW, you can propose to change that part *not* to copy the general@ when such vote(s) are proposed On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > On 18.03.2013 11:35, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > Hi > > > > Last time I checked the rules it state that, for such votes, the IPMC > > should be *notified* through general@ > > This VOTE is not a requirement but is recommended. It is unlikely > that IPMC members will vote to approve graduation unless the Mentors > and community positively express their readiness for graduation. It > is wise to copy the incubator general list when the vote is proposed. > > > I see no requirement to notify. And I still maintain it's confusing, as > evidenced by this very case. > > It would make more sense if general@ were notified after the fact of the > vote result, e.g., as an addendum to the graduation vote proposal. > There's absolutely no call for the IPMC to poke our fingers into what > are obviously optional, internal podling procedures. That's almost as > bad as doing code reviews for them. > > -- Brane > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
