On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote: > I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled > because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then > authorization. > > However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the > incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under > incubator/RETIRED instead. > > i.e. > > incubator/alois=> incubator/RETIRED/alois > > This would have some advantages: > - the top-level incubator/ tree would only show current podlings (and > lazy graduates!).
Good. > - it would be obvious which SVN trees were retired without needing to > open the sub-tree Good. > - it might make it simpler to set up the correct svn mailer/auth permissions I don't have an opinion on this. > > The main disadvantage that I can see is that the SVN URL in the status > file would be incorrect. This could of course be corrected. I think this is a fair tradeoff against the benefits above. Craig > > Thoughts? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
