Hi,
I've adapted code of the eid applet [1], which is partly ASL dual-licensed [2],
i.e. the parts I've used.
The code for xml signatures went into POI 3.11-beta3 [3], the latest stable is
POI 3.12.
The individual copyright holders of the eid applet gave me their approval [4],
but I'm still missing the approval of FedICT [5], a belgium federal public
service -
it seems nobody of them feels responsible for that code.
The new copyright holder seems to be e-Contract.be BVBA [4].
So looking at the IP clearance process [6]:
@ 1.: I've became an ASF member recently, so I'll do
@ 3.: apart of the announcement on [4] what form of approval is further
required?
as the copyright seemed to move to BVBA, would it be sufficient to ask
Frank for a SGA [7]?
@ 5.: "If the source is referenced by checksum in the grant ...", so if no
specific release is mentioned
and only certain files contain the ASL, do I need to snapshot anything?
If yes, as there was no 1:1 adaption of the code, should I simply snapshot
the files my work was based on
or is it necessary to reproduce which parts went into the poi files?
Thank you and best wishes,
Andi
PS: ... yes, the obvious issue is, that incubation is done in a timely
different order ...
[1] https://code.google.com/p/eid-applet/
[2] https://code.google.com/p/eid-applet/source/browse/trunk/README.txt
[3] http://poi.apache.org/changes.html
[4]
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/eid-applet/apache$20poi/eid-applet/Mnnl2KpdTXE/geNlO2-c410J
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedict
[6] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
[7] https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
