> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were to > still have significant concerns (either ones that weren't addressed in the > DISCUSS thread or I missed the DISCUSS thread, etc), it'd still be socially > permissible (not just procedurally permissible) to -1 a VOTE? I ask 'cos, > well, I'm easily cowed by social pressure on this sort of thing, so bucking > the herd isn't easy. If I feel that a potential podling has reached VOTE > stage while still having issues that in my mind make it a bad candidate to > enter the Incubator, I want to be sure I can still -1 it without being > turned into a pariah in the process. =) > > (and again - this is purely hypothetical) >
Yes, you can vote a -1. NO ONE should feel pressured to vote on something in a way opposite to how they feel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
