On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >...
> To be fair, I will circle one more time to existing mentors for Eagle > to confirm their commitment for active participation in the podling. > Would that be acceptable solution? > Acceptable to whom? I bet you there are enough people who find the list of mentors to be acceptable, despite Marvin's emails otherwise... :-) To put it another way: it is unfair to pre-judge people. Even more, *accepting* a podling should not be subject to a preapproved list of mentors, since we have juggled mentors many times in the past. *Should* a mentor be absent in the *future*, then they can be replaced. ... but I believe it is better to be reactive, than to pre-judge. Cheers, -g
