There's information about attribution from google fonts. https://www.google.com/fonts/attribution
The referenced font is SIL OFL 1.1 http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL You're not technically bundling the font, but referencing it via URL. It's a good question for legal. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:26 PM Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com> wrote: > One more question: There's one line in AdminLTE (under MIT license) > [1]: *@import > url( > https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Source+Sans+Pro:300,400,600,700,300italic,400italic,600italic > < > https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Source+Sans+Pro:300,400,600,700,300italic,400italic,600italic > >); > * > Should any downstream (who using AdminLTE) also need add such stuff about > Google Fonts and Adobe Fonts whatever use the font or not? > > Thanks. > > 1. > https://github.com/almasaeed2010/AdminLTE/blob/master/dist/css/AdminLTE.css > > > > Best Regards! > --------------------- > > Luke Han > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > To > > > > keep things simple, the new release will continue mark as v1.1 since > > > > there's no much code changes. > > > > > > The release will have a significant difference in content. Giving a > > > distinct release an identical release number will not simplify things! > > > I suggest you call it 1.1.1 or something. > > > > > > > I agree, I don't see it explicitly called out in our release policy but I > > would assume we cannot reuse release numbers. > > > > Julian, thank you very much for keeping an eye on this. > > > > > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
