Thanks for doing the audit. The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site.
However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website. The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". Considering the Geode web design was forked from another TLP, is it possible that some of the feedback is a bit arbitrary? Otherwise maybe all incubating projects should have the same website template, and then be free to evolve their design once they graduate to TLP. -Greg On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > John D. Ament wrote on 6/29/16 7:36 AM: > > Hey guys > > > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues. > > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not > > within branding requirements. > > > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings, but I > > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas, Beam and > > Blur. Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting projects. > > > > John > > > > Thanks for the good work! Please do report back - here or to > trademarks@ - about your progress and how PPMCs respond. > > In particular, any feedback on our published policies/guidelines is very > important. As we scale, we need to ensure that most podlings can figure > out the right thing to do from the docs, and not as much from direct > pushes by our volunteer mentors and IPMC folks. > > Separately, a long-term project of mine is to ensure the branding bits > on the incubator site are clear and point to the right parts of the > formal trademark policies here: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > - Shane > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
