Hi John, Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions in general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are issues with the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining why and what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you pointed out it was "too empty" for you but I'm not sure there is a list I'm not aware of but it would have been completely silently ignored cause batchee@ wouldn't have been notified of that.
More generally it is quite hard to fill this report for stable projects (which doesn't mean they are not alive but just they are stable enough to not get as much activity as BigData projects ;)). I'm not sure we should group them either in a new umbrella project or an existing one - typically we could create an inconsistent bucket in term of user communities but consistent in term of maintainers/asf guys - or just keep it like that but this "issue" will come back regularly I think and it would be great to "skip" these round trips if possible and have a clear statement about projects having by design an irregular activity - thinking to EE projects which have a big activity after spec releases then mainly just maintenance until next round. You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small projects be swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of lifecycle/activity issue and avoid to create inconsistent (user) communities but I have to admit I don't have a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that area. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-08-08 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > wrote: > > > John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments I did > > today. > > > > > Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and paste). > > > > The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also sending > > a mail to the respective podling if you have feedback. > > > > I know that I've personally sent feedback/questions to BatchEE before, > without any response from the podling. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/262e43b2bb49d1ef5058a74f43b4f7 > c1e4ec6b9fb4f5896d28e95918@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/044be9dc4b10136a7025ca5e031b33 > 12e2dee8b93680483a754b594e@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > > - John > > > > > > That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much easier. > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
