John/Justin, Have the questions you asked been answered to your satisfaction? Is there any additional information we can provide for your review?
Frank On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Orhan Kislal <okis...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Hi, > > The changelist files take new names with every version and then get > updated. These files do not have license headers (like the other old files) > but they were part of the pre-Apache life of MADlib. I believe the > confusion originates from using the regular "mv" command instead of "git > mv". > > Thanks, > > Orhan > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The MADlib community is unclear on how to deal with the dual license. > > > > Well that makes two off us. :-) > > > > > Till now we've treated all *new* files (i.e. files that were created > > > after joining Apache) as Apache license with required headers and all > > > old files under the BSD. > > > > I can see several new files that don’t have Apache headers. For example > > incubator-madlib-1.9.1/src/madpack/changelist_*_1.9.1.yaml > > > > > Is it recommended that we add the Apache header on any file that > > > contains an edit (old or new)? > > > > The advice here [1] (see points 4 and 5) say only if the changes are > > significant but it assumes that files have a license header in the first > > place. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > 1.http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
