No, you are free to make this release provided there is an issue tracking the RAT check failures and a promise to fix them for the next release.
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > Many thanks! > > I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which > seems better in any case. These issues will be fixed asap in master and the > live site. > > > On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it. > > +1 (binding) > >> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next >> release. >> >> Here is my +1 the . >> >>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm >>> the podling has it entered into their bug tracker. Then they accept >>> the +1. We don't generally wait for a code change to be made, but would >>> block the next release if these issues are not addressed. I personally >>> want to understand why we're requiring the podling to fix it now before >>> approving the release. This looks like PredictionIO's first release, so we >>> wouldn't have seen this already. >>> >>> The contents of the release generally look good. IN addition to the notes >>> from Luciano, your NOTICE file should be updated to reflect 2016-2017 ASF. >>> I would recommend renaming these files to just NOTICE and LICENSE and drop >>> the .txt, to better comply with the licensing. >>> >>> Here's my +1, not waiting for anything to be fixed. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I will too, and then you will have two binding votes in the affirmative. >>>> >>>>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and we >>> thank >>>>>> you for being the one who took a look either way. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are just trying to move, out if possible or iterate if not. These >>>>>> issues have not changed from the current release and so do not >>> indicate >>>>>> regression and they have Jira’s for the next release. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Not necessary, once this is fixed in master I would vote ok for the >>>> current >>>>> RC >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Luciano Resende >>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Sent from my Mobile device > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
