On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:31 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Bertrand, > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:31 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:59 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > ...While there is > > > no perfect release, we do expect all licensing issues to be cleared up > by > > > the time they graduate, and the current release indicates they are > not... > > > > Does this mean you are opposed to SystemML graduating at this point? > > > > > I am. However, I'll point out that the last podling in this situation, > Kylin, did re-roll a release to fix the remaining issues, and was able to > get me to vote a +1 on their graduation. I do not plan to vote a -1 on > SystemML > > > > Luciano's reference to releases 0.12 and 0.13 passing without > > problems, as well as (at least) 3 ASF members on the proposed PMC make > > me confident about graduating. > > > > I believe the reasons the last two releases passed cleanly has more to do > with who reviewed those releases and what they were looking for rather than > something new. The LICENSE issues I noted have existed for 6 months, those > two releases are less than 6 months old. Simply not enough time on my side > to review all releases. > > Each of SystemML's releases have gotten better, it just concerns me that in > their last release they agreed to fix things in the next release - which is > conceivably outside the incubator. > > FYI, the issues you mentioned related to 0.14 release have been fixed in master: https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/88e79bb341ea099e932cd85ace75389a5cb53ca7 https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/8ad35c5b1a6958862dfab3d5f6232988ce57f36e -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
