Out of curiousity: Do we ever let domains like this expire? Greets, Myrle
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes sense to me. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 6/8/17, 1:42 AM, "Greg Stein" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Raphael Bircher > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am .06.2017, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz > > > <[email protected]>: > > >> ...Am I missing something? > > > > > > Yea, as far as I know it is in a old version who is in the archive, > > right. I > > > think this makes some difference... > > > > Ah yes you're right, we might want to pull the old binaries from the > > archive as well, in addition to the changes that I suggested. > > > > In the specific case of Apache Ignite's invocation of that URL and passing > along certain data ... that is no longer relevant, even for OLD versions, > as the Foundation currently controls the ignite.run domain (and host). > That > host will no longer resolve, so no HTTP request will be performed, and > (certainly) no data will be collected from old/new versions of Apache > Ignite. > > Cheers, > Greg Stein > Infrastructure Administrator, ASF > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
