On 2 November 2017 at 21:07, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually when the podling is retired the SVN and or GIT must be deleted. It’s > mean, but if people cared they could have contributed and kept it going.
Huh? The website is deleted, but AFAIK SVN/Git is just made read-only. > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Should the Apache Incubator update the README on all retired podlings, to >> more clearly indicate their retired status? >> >> For example, from the README at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk , >> it's not obvious that the podling is retired. >> >> I know there's a RETIRED.txt file, but that's easily overlooked. I suggest >> the Incubator PMC updating the retired projects' README's with an >> indication that the podling is retired, perhaps with a link to an >> explanation of what that means: >> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html#what_is_retirement >> >> For example, simply inserting the following line at the top of retired >> podlings README's may suffice: >> >> This project is [retired]( >> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html#what_is_retirement) >> >> I don't think this is a big deal, but might be something nice to do. >> Another option is to stop mirroring retired podlings to GitHub, but that >> just seems mean. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
