Hi, > Thanks for pointing out the json license issue. I searched the code and > found only a small piece of code that uses it so it shouldn't be hard to > replace with an alternative. For my understanding, when [1] states "CAN > APACHE PRODUCTS INCLUDE WORKS LICENSED UNDER THE JSON LICENSE?", does > either having the source code in the source release or having a build or > runtime dependency count as "including" the licensed work? In our case we > have a build+runtime dependency but do not include the source code.
Sorry to say but you can’t have a build or runtime dependancy and you can’t distribute it [1] unless it’s optional [2]. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
