> Voting will start now (May 18th, 2018) and will remain open for at least 72 
> hours, Request all IPMC members to give their vote.

> [ ] +1 Release this package.
> [ ] +0 No opinion.
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because….


My vote: +1 (binding)


My notes:

 - Peng Yongsheng, please remember to keep your english (ascii) name in the 
email from field along with your real name: 彭勇升 
When you sent the mail to IPMC there was no english name accompanying your 
chinese name. Sheng is consistent in this practice, so is a good example. 
I know it's unfortunate, but those of us that can't speak chinese simply find 
it too difficult to distinguish and remember the chinese characters and names.
This will also hinder you from getting responses and votes.

 - I agree with Stian that '5.0.0-beta' should have been labeled either 
'5.0.0-beta-0' or '5.0.0-rc1'. 
You can't make any presumption about how many release attempts will be required 
to get a successful vote.
And each attempt requires a new version name, that is you should not overwrite 
release tags nor uploaded binaries. 
Even if you make a mistake, just move onto the next version: 5.0.0-beta-1, 
5.0.0-beta-2, 5.0.0-beta-3, etc
That is, it's perfectly acceptable to "skip" version numbers, because you made 
a mistake during the release process or the vote fails. You also can't make any 
presumption about how many beta or rc releases you'll need to make _before_ the 
community is ready for a GA release. The number of beta/rc releases is not 
fixed or predetermine. I also think it is good habit to never re-tag or 
uploaded over an existing version. If you take this approach Peng, then the 
releasing step becomes less ambiguous, for example the binary and source 
version is always the same as the git tag. 

 - "72 hours is not a time-out, but a minimum period"
This is important. It is crucial to be patient. There's nothing wrong with 
waiting a week, it's all up to the cadence of the developers you've got.  For 
those that have families, or for whatever other reason, it is all too easy to 
be missing-in-action for a few days.

 - "sponsored by Incubator" instead of "sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC"
Good catch Stian. Something to fix in master so it's correct when the next 
release comes around.

regards,
Mick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to