The question was only about the user discussions (e.g. to replace the
user mailinglist). The project will of course have a dev mailinglist
with the usual decision making.
-s
On 16.01.19 16:22, sebb wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 16:19, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Sebastian <s...@apache.org> wrote:
So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the
discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist),
than they could keep using the board?
That's my understanding. It applied to the ASF Slack, for example, or
IRC, or other communication channels in general. The idea is that you
want your project's decision making to be asynchronously accessible by
all interested parties via ASF infrastructure.
I thought the rule was that decisions have to be made on ASF mailing lists.
It's fine to have discussions elsewhere, but the results must be
brought back to a mailing list for the actual decision.
Or has that rule been changed? If so, is it documented anywhere?
S
--
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
