Hi all, we’re currently working on some pre-graduation work and stumbled over something: In the Apache Maturity Model [1] is says that:
CS40 - In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are justified by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules defined in CS30. However the Incubator Default Project Guidelines [2] suggest code changes are “lazy consensus” and stuff like Comitter, PMC, Chai changes are “Consensus approval” which is described as: Consensus approval requires 3 binding<https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#binding-votes> +1 votes and no -1 votes (vetoes<https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Veto>). So these two seem to be contradicting each other. Not quite sure which rules should be applied. Chris [1] https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html [2] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DefaultProjectGuidelines
