Found the WIP Disclaimer.

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:58 PM leerho <lee...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Justin,
> Thank you so much for your response!
> ( I feel like I'm in a vacuum at times ... so your help is much
> appreciated!! )
>
> I will do a thorough license search.
> I will try to locate the WIP Disclaimer ... do you have a link?
>
> Right now I am struggling with pom issue related to the
> maven-remote-resources-plugin.
> It is creating errors no matter what I do, so I must be doing something
> wrong:
>
>    - If I don't have it in pom at all I get the error: "missing required
>    source folder: 'target/maven-shared-archive-resources'
>    - If I include the plugin in the pom project build as:
>
>             <plugin>
>                 <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>                 <artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId>
>                 <version>${maven-remote-resources-plugin.version}</version>
>                 <executions>
>                     <execution>
>                         <goals>
>                             <goal>process</goal>
>                         </goals>
>                         <configuration>
>                             <properties>
>                                 <projectName>Apache DataSketches Memory
> (incubating)</projectName>
>                             </properties>
>                             <resourceBundles>
>
> <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.5-SNAPSHOT</resourceBundle>
>
> <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.2-SNAPSHOT</resourceBundle>
>                             </resourceBundles>
>                         </configuration>
>                     </execution>
>                 </executions>
>             </plugin>
>
>
> I get the error: maven-remote-resources-plugin:[1.0,) or one of its
> dependencies could not be resolved: Failure to find
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:jar:[1.0,) in
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository,
> resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has
> elapsed or updates are forced.
>
> Yet I know I have the above versions in my local .m2 !
>
> Changing the versions to 1.4 and 1.1 doesn't help -- still can't find it.
>
> Running mvn process-resources doesn't help.
>
> Running maven project update from eclipse doesn't help.
>
> Now if I place the plug-in into its own profile like this ( found this in
> a blog ) :
>         <!-- Ignore nuisance warning from Apache parent plugin:
>           "maven-remote-resources-plugin (goal "process") is ignored by
> m2e".
>           This also should fix the Maven warning that it can't find the
> lifecycle-mapping jar.
>           This profile is only active when the property "m2e.version" is
> set,
>           which is the case when building in Eclipse with m2e.
>           The "ignore" below tells m2eclipse to skip the execution.
>         -->
>         <profile>
>             <id>m2e</id>
>             <activation>
>               <property>
>                 <name>m2e.version</name>
>               </property>
>             </activation>
>             <build>
>                 <pluginManagement>
>                   <plugins>
>                     <plugin>
>                       <groupId>org.eclipse.m2e</groupId>
>                       <artifactId>lifecycle-mapping</artifactId>
>                       <version>${lifecycle-mapping.version}</version>
>                       <configuration>
>                         <lifecycleMappingMetadata>
>                           <pluginExecutions>
>                             <pluginExecution>
>                                 <pluginExecutionFilter>
>
> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId>
>
> <versionRange>${maven-remote-resources-plugin.version}</versionRange>
>                                     <goals>
>                                         <goal>process</goal>
>                                     </goals>
>                                 </pluginExecutionFilter>
>                               <action>
>                                 <ignore />
>                               </action>
>                             </pluginExecution>
>                           </pluginExecutions>
>                         </lifecycleMappingMetadata>
>                       </configuration>
>                     </plugin>
>                   </plugins>
>                 </pluginManagement>
>             </build>
>         </profile>
>
> Then if I do a "mvn clean" I am back to the error: "missing required
> source folder: 'target/maven-shared-archive-resources"
>
> Then if I do a "mvn clean process-resources" the errors go away! And I do
> get the  "target/maven-shared-archive-resources" folder with the right
> stuff.
>
> Studying other project is even more confusing: Apache Pinot and Apache
> Druid have the plugin under project build.  (how do they get it to work?)
>
> Apache Beam doesn't specify it at all (they use the
> maven-resources-plugin).
>
> Apache Commons-CSV doesn't specify the plugin at all.
>
> I am not confident that my placing it in its own profile is the right
> thing to do, but it is the only thing that seems to work right now, but no
> other project I have found does it this way.
>
> Advice please.
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:26 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I have fixed the LICENSE file as you requested.
>>
>> I hope you noticed that a couple of the files included multiple,
>> differently licensed, pieces of 3rd party code. Each license needs to be
>> listed and checked if it is compatible with the Apache License. If Apache
>> LIcense you need to check if they have a NOTICE file and copy it’s contents
>> into your NOTICE file.
>>
>> > Is it OK if these fixes go into the next release?
>>
>> Sure, as always you can make a release if you get 3 or more +1 votes, and
>> more +1 than -1 votes. You have no -1 votes, and I believe more than 3 +1
>> votes form IPMC members, 72 hours have passed so you are all good to go.
>>
>> Not however the recent discussion around a work in progress disclaimer,
>> you might want to move to using that rather than the standard disclaimer.
>>
>> You might want to make sure there are not other issues, I didn’t do a
>> full check of what was in the release. I’d suggest running rat on it (which
>> found some issues) and search for copyright statements or URLs that
>> reference GitHub or other repos.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to