Hi, > Another variation/option for those using the WIP disclaimer might be that > since the WIP disclaimer kind of says this release doesn't have "full > official" status from an ASF point of view then one way of thinking about > it is that perhaps full official IPMC endorsement is less of a requirement > so IPMC voting could be 3 days but lazy.
I like the idea but this wouldn’t be in line with the current ASF bylaws. I think they would need to be changed for this to happen. > I have no problem giving +1 to (E) at all but in reality, it is almost no > effort for the 3 mentioned IPMC members on the dev list to just +1 the IPMC > vote, so are we picking up the real problem podlings? Only about 10%(?) of podlings manage to get 3 +1 votes from mentors/IPMC members on their dev lists. even podlings with 3 active mentors can’t always get 3 +1 votes, some podlings have 6 mentors and still can’t get 3 +1 votes on their releases.. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
