Hi, +1 (binding)
I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE is basically ok(there is still a category b dependency in the source code) - All necessary files have license headers To Willem Jiang, the problem I listed last time was the main license issue(category X should be removed and may keep the category b dependency in binary ) :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling tan zhongyi <zhongyi....@gmail.com> 于2020年2月21日周五 下午5:21写道： > Yes, we will fix these issues later, > so we add WIP disclaimer as Justin suggested. > Thanks > > > > 在 2020/2/19 下午7:36，“Justin Mclean”<jus...@classsoftware.com> 写入: > > Hi, > > > From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license > > dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. > > You can’t have a category X dependancy unless it’s optional. So GPL or > LGPL dependancies are in general not allowed. See [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > -- Nothing is impossible
