AFAIK, Guillaume fixed the issue as described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-586
Nothing blocks now, isn't it? Do we consider the clearance ok as a conclusion, or should we restart a new thread? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021, 10:05:06 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit : > FYI legal JIRA raise https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-586 > cheers > Olivier > > On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 19:26, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Can we replace the header with the following one instead: > > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/native/incl > > ude/jni.h < > > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/native/incl > > ude/jni.h> > > > It is more clearly GPLv2 w/ CPE, so it should be allowed, as my > > > understanding is that it is an exception to category X. > > > > AFAIK it is not. It is listed as Category X here [1]. > > > > Form memory there might some cases where GPL + CPE might be OK as a > > dependancy but it’s not OK in a release. Probably best to discuss on legal > > discuss list or raise a legal JIRA. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
